You still got the last laugh after the priest is forced to use immune death action, did you?
Can someone explain to me where my Logic Train Breaks. I don’t get why no one agrees with me 
- Hippo claims Sheriff. He is uncc’d.
- Hippo claim Poisoned. Captain also claims Poisoned.
- This is impossible. Captain must be lying as Hippo is an uncc’d, unconvertable, unique role.
- Captain cannot be BD as he lies.
- Mole verified Captain’s BD claim. Mole must also be lying.
^What is wrong with this?? (this is not rhetorical I am actually really confused)^
voets:
orange: 2 - Hippo, tard
alfa: 6 - orange, nerbibs, damama, PerKeR, mol, forst, norski. yau
majority is 8
This was the Vote count when trial began
#Trial is trialing, it will end in 24 hours or if a majority is reached, you will vote in the thread
Because Captain could have been poisoned, and it was used day 2. You were obviously poisoned just now, so it does not mean that he is lying about the poison
You’re claiming that two people that not one of us has scumread even slightly are lying in a monumentally stupid gambit that they are very unlikely to be attempting.
Furthermore, you claim to have attempted to Posse Comitatus me, but I recieved no such notification. Since there is no role that can prevent you from targeting me, this claim is highly suspect.
[b]/vote Guilty[/u]
Any inno voters are idiots. This goes through anyways, voting Innocent won’t save you even if you think she’s Fool somehow.
No. Just no.
I’m here now and I’m PKR if anything, not PerKeR 
Behave you two. You might be mods, but I can talk back without worry when it comes to my name 