That’s mostly due to scum attacking neutrals.
Scum mistakes are not really indicative or BD being good.
FoL 9 had better town play if we count that it was based on Merc being contracted to town.
That’s mostly due to scum attacking neutrals.
Scum mistakes are not really indicative or BD being good.
FoL 9 had better town play if we count that it was based on Merc being contracted to town.
I mean yes, which is why I nominated it first
But I think it’s hard to argue that the only FoL game in history with zero dead Blue Dragon isn’t worth at least the nom
Agree, seconded.
to be honest i don’t think “zero dead blue dragon” is indicative of much
like you could have two games where BD never miselims but in one of them scum fails the nightkills and/or NK kills scum
that doesn’t mean the town played better in one game or the other
i mean if nothing else its indicative of a town sweep
Not really
town can sweep and still have dead town, it just depends on what happened with the night kills which 90% of the time is not affected by town’s skill so much as chance
this is in fol by the way
obviously in vanilla games it’s pretty much impossible to have 0 dead town
i meant
if there are no town dead
then it means town swept
not the other way around
I remember that fol game where town always lynched non-town and still lost.
It was objectively also a well-played game even if I’d argue FoL9 was a stronger town performance specifically
I agree that FoL9 had better town performance, with actual planning and working with materials town got.
FoL8 was… just worse.
so second FoL9 and/or Ashe’s play in that game
vulgourd already did
he seconded FoL8
I had nominated FoL9 and Ashe in particular in the giant wall
p sure nobody seconded either one
sure i’ll second
also had this
if you’re interested in seconding
was i in fol9 or no
if i was i dont think i can second