[FoL] EFoL 3 - Cult Wins

Lol you think what you want.

I voted kai because there arguments were very weak

If it’s a case of omgus then look at my post

Alice, when you get a chance, could you take a look at Soul’s Iso? I’m trying to figure out if they’re LHF or scum, and you historically seem to be at least moderately decent at determining that.

1 Like

I have reasoning behind my views on kai and their’s no real pushes right now so I’m going to advance peoples activity even if it’s risky for myself.

Also what does LHF stand for it’s not a normally used mafia term that I can find looking up

Why don’t you explain my post and why my push on kai is weak instead of make the argument of Omgus.

LHF = Low-hanging fruit, basically a villager who is in some way acting scummy such that it would be easy for scum to push a mislynch.

If you think I’m acting scummy your seriously funny.

I explained my view on kai, I’m allowed to vote someone if I please it’s not OMGUS just because they voted me first

I would of voted priestess if so.

Just because you don’t agree with Kai’s reasoning for voting you doesn’t mean he’s scum. Even if you disagree with the conclusions of Kai’s analysis, it seems like a relatively townie analysis to me, both in that it’s clearly extremely well-thought-out and in that the reasoning is in fact generally solid, even if you disagree with it.

1 Like

Kai’s analysis is weak and feels like kai jumped a easy bandwagon I’m sorry am I meant to just not push on people now?

It’s not well thought out in any way shape or form. It’s mainly weak arguments based on me being inconsistent and taking any meaning out of wait I said.

Kai even left out a important part in the first reply post to me.

Also generally priestess has pointed out half of this crap already.

I wish I had more people’s imput but I don’t think what kai said even had any effort put into it.

If Kai had given a similar analysis of another player, who was acting similarly to the way you’ve been acting, would you have still voted him?

Yes I would have.

Might of took me longer because I’d read through two players points instead of one but if I think someones argument is weak I’m going to push them.

I don’t think you know how pushing or voting works, we haven’t really had any other arguments so we can’t argue either way if I would of done it to someone else but If I noticed it and found it scummy for sure I would of pushed them.

Why are you like this

Hey sulit what are your thoughts on the current things going on if you have anything

Anyone pushing for a no-lynch, shush

Is lynching more likely to hit BD? Possibly

Will it make us lose the game? Hell no

Lynching D1 gives BD more information, both from the flip and from D1 interactions. If we hit scum, great! If we hit BD, less great, but it still makes it easier to solve.

I’d say from least great to most great in terms of D1 lynches it’d go:

  1. Powerole lynch
  2. no lynch
  3. town lynch
  4. scum lynch

fades into the shadows

Uhh

Priestess annoys me sometimes

You’re being defensive but I don’t know what I think about you yet

Have you played a lot before

I don’t like Dat

2 Likes

I think that’s fair, while I rather you be more involved I do think it’s better then nothing.
I also think being less passive and lynching d1 benefits bd but I do think we need to be careful and infomation isn’t worth the bd lynch but it would at least slightly help us in some ways.

Priestess is a cool person and epic but she’s annoying in fm sometimes. ;p

I agree that I am playing defensive here but I’m also trying to create something otherwise we’d all be doing nothing and acting passive.