You would have a point if serial sheepers ever stopped, but no. It is better to remove the safety net and let those who refuse to improve get punished.
Newbs will make mistakes, but if they are smart, they won’t make them again.
Precisely because they wouldn’t stop serial sheeping, you would want the impact of a vote to be less not higher. You are directly advocating against your point here.
They are still punished, just less severely. I think you’re all overestimating the possible negative reinforcement effect that this change could have on bad sheeping.
We should strive to find a balance between the majority of players on this site and where we would aim to be in quality of playstyle. If “bad” players are the majority of this site than that should weigh in on the balancing decisions, because isn’t that who the game is made for?
If I could have made a more educated guess, I wouldn’t have asked. 
Still jetlagged, so that might factor in.
I suspect it wouldn’t be reverted, because this is balancing for more experienced players. These players are precisely way more involved into making these kinds of decisions. There would not be as much of a push to revert it back.
1 Like
And get everyone to confirm in classcards? Im pretty happy with that
What about princes jail though?
1 Like
it’s not BS
it’s the art of stupid gambits that usually fail however sometimes offer somewhat promising results that you can still screw up
4 Likes
Okay @NuclearBurrito time to discuss it here
What if we made cult converted knight cold steel Ability infinite uses
however it kills him on the second successful use
