SFoL 22.5 lol
Just to keep it consistent, the Warlock will not be rolled as a class for now in the tournament. If another does happen in the future, then it would be considered. However, for now, I will be rolling the usual stuff that is currently being reworked or changed, and keep the class based on the original card before the change.
3 Likes
All neutrals do have survivability methods, even ones who donāt necessarily have to survive until the end of the game
Scorned has night immunity, Merc has Stand Guard, Fool has Hide, Alch has Stoneskin, Many NKs have night immunity or some form of protection.
Soooo, yeah.
Warlock needs some survival mechanism
2 Likes
Well regardless the point is moot because the warlock does need to survive
1 Like
agreed. Like even if it was just a simple night immunity passive or some shit like that.
Giving him a night immunity passive would be okay considering he appears Unseen/Cult to Investigative checks
1 Like
The appears Unseen/Cult is already a weakness to him. So at least give him night immunity.
(yes I am assuming his gender heck off)
Burrito is completely right. He has 0 survivability. One time immunity would probably make him a bit better.
If I had to guess, either not requiring him to survive or a one shot bulletproof esque passive is probably something thatād happen
5 Likes
Which would we prefer for warlock?
- One Passive Night Immunity (functions just like inquisitor in ToL)
- Doesnāt have to survive to win
0 voters
2 Likes
Wait we can do what ever we want if it doesnāt have to survive
Letās accuse the sheriff/pally of being unseen!
Actually yeah no survival would be cooler
Surviving with your unseen/cult passive is hard anyway
Doesnāt have to survive to win is not as interesting. Warlock would have no problem fakeclaiming with the invest ability, and that combined with the one bp wouldnāt make it too hard.
2 Likes
seems to me like we need to try both over time to really see which plays out better