Is this misinformed? Pretty sure it is
The whole reason for the Fool change was to make Fool have almost no impact on the gamestate, because thatās the only situation where I can accept a Fool even as a theoretical possibility. Itās just not fun to have to WIFOM every read or get screwed over for it.
1 Like
Or more accurately, it has no impact on the gamestate unless the Fool is especially skilled at their job.
1 Like
Why, because its punishing? I think people need something in the back of their heads like a class that can punish them for pushing a Fool.
Ill say you can take out the first part, but you need a mechanic to make it seem like so-and-so is not worth a lynch and you are lynching on a read.
The thing that punishes pushing too hard on people is a person a flipping a villager. There is no limit on the stupidity of villagers.
3 Likes
You guys get scum by Day 3 figured. What are the numbers on town vs evil victories? Its gotta be heavily in favor of town.
I think they tried that in the past
When your scumread goes
Shurian was executed. He was a Fool.
Ah, fish. Rip BD, Unseen/Cult its time to dance on our corpses
The setup is not brokenly villagesided because it dosenāt have a Jester, itās because the wolves fucking suck at their jobs.
6 Likes
Like, itās not that hard to try as evil
But people still somehow manage to not try
Exactly. Fool makes town think, whereas now they are just āCool you scumslipped, hereās your buddies by association GG boysā. I donāt enjoy town rolls.
Again, this is not because a Fool wasnāt a possibility. Nobody talked about Fool relaisitcally even when it was a major threat, only as a stupid possibility.
@Possessed again, if the wolves were actually good that wouldnāt happen.
2 Likes
Itās scum job to not scumslip, it shouldnāt be the fools job to make scum have a crutch