FoL Feedback Thread

Forum Matches Forum of Lies
#12139

Totally siding with Priestess on this. :man_shrugging:

#12140

I think they should be able to let on enough where a majority of the time this happening would be a mistake and not inevitable

#12141

Knight: makes a good decision, they shoot an Assassin
CW: makes a good decision, they protect the prince by swapping them with the Assassin (the assassin will not shoot himself normally)
Both: made a good decision, they didnā€™t out their classes and their night plans

#12142

In isolation yes

#12143

I meant to reply on here

#12144

You mean let it on well enough for a Warlock to redirect the Knight or an Assassin choosing another target?

#12145

Exactly
You punish them for making GOOD decisions

#12146

But this is not a single-player game and we shouldnā€™t treat it like one

#12147

Sure

In that case maybe make a different decision in the first place

#12148

Hypotheticals donā€™t do shit to a question of are we making a skilled game or a handholdey one

#12149

One that follows cause and effect or one that fixes issues for you

#12150

I donā€™t want to play FoL for babies, personally

#12151

Or donā€™t create a situation where it has to be hinted, whereas in isolation, itā€™d be great ability usage.

#12152

I am sorry, if Assassin attacks Prince he doesnā€™t get killed but a Knight do get killed by attacking assassin but end up attacking Prince?

Both Prince, Assassin and Knight dies this scenario.

#12153

But why should scum making that swap not reap the benefits of their foresight?

1 Like
#12154

No I meant, Assassin attacks anyone else, idk
But the Knight CSes the Assassin and gets swapped to the Prince, therefore both Knight and Prince die

#12155

They would reap benefits of the Knight not being able to action.

#12156

Thatā€™s a guilt problem

#12157

Hence the earlier ā€œoff-topicā€ discussion on guilt

#12158

tell me why you are against the solution ā€œbd attacks who cause suicide are canceling itself when redirectedā€