FoL Feedback Thread

so it’s not an sfol

iirc, sfol doesn’t have to match fol in terms of flavour, but it must, at least roughly, match fol in terms of mechanics

wait ignore me, sfol 53 had no conversion or neuts

carry on

Minus the syndicate of course :unamused:

I mean the syndicate is nowhere near as bad now that we know what the classes do

i would consider making a second syndicate game
i love the lore around the faction
maybe with a slight nerf to templar

bd lost a very bad thunderdome and 4 tk’s misfired. had we won the thunderdome, safe to say we would have won
but no anti-claim mechanic against the prince or justicar in my game, that was stupid

that’s just standard forum mafia with adiart flavour . . .

2 Likes

So is SFoL53 apparently

I do like they are mysterious we know nothing about them, I agree it’s not that bad.

It’s not that bad.

But of course I haven’t said what exactly entails I might wanna host it.

It has FoL classes so why would it be called fm?

Merc is memeing on my post i think

I had the same thought you had :"^}
so I copied and pasted your comment

3 Likes

Ok :slight_smile:

SFoL53 was pretty terrible in all possible regards… and like I said, had not really any fol aspects left, it just used a few of the fol class cards.

1 Like

Tbh the build was a lot more designed by vulgard than me
I’m not great at running games but im also pretty bad at designing them

Since vul left for good, it might be best to let virtuous as a setup fade away

53 was Looming Threat
Maxwell

oh ignore me

1 Like