FoL Feedback Thread

Yes please

Also hot take

Polls shouldnā€™t be anonymous and shouldnā€™t require a vote to see the results

3 Likes

Like Iā€™m not voting on the Strigoi one

So Iā€™ll never know what it entails really

anon polls allow people to hide behind a vote
ill be honest about my votes tbh if someone asks me

like if you ask people for their reasoning
it can lead to a better solution

Makes sense. Theyll be closed after a few days anyways so you can see it then anyways.
Anonymous is kinda a protection against being targetted or shamed for your opinions, since thats sadly not a rarety here.

i mean
if you consider asking for reasoning and disgareeing with their opinions ā€œtargeted and or shamedā€
i think you need to reeval why you really made it anonymous

Ive seen too much shit happening with extreme targetting and shaming here. Noone without a forum account can vote, so what are you afraid of?

I have multiple :thinking:

But nah

Itā€™s fine

I just think itā€™s overly cautious and less likely to hold meaning when this will be determined via discussion in the end anyways

1 Like

NK being so weak is why I made their wincon significantly more feasible in my setup

yes, i consider NK to be entirely unwinnable in current Classical FoL and all forms that Classical FoL has taken within the past year

something needs to be addressed so that we donā€™t keep asking people to play in slots that arenā€™t possible to win with

Unforunately, despite this forumā€™s best efforts, the majority still feels like 1% to 15% is perfectly acceptable, if not overly generous.

Thatā€™s a wide range

1% is way too low

15% is overly generous

In fact itā€™s worth noting that in shifting to 18 players the NKā€™s theoretical ideal winrate has dropped

We do do D1 lynches, right?

If so just do 17p tbh

No we donā€™t

Ah

rip lmao

Hot take

Include them, 17p

That could work tbh