FoL Feedback Thread

Forum Matches Forum of Lies
#1979

Make it occupy immune? It feels just a tad too weak.

#1980

Eh. Good enough

#1981

thats dumb u just bleed someone and heal them next night and u proven

1 Like
#1982

and then you arenā€™t night immune
there are also no notifications for if you are healed

#1983

Alchemist without survivability? Thatā€™s shady as af especially with this objective.

#1984

and it isnt nearly antiBD enough to not do that

1 Like
#1985

This also makes it semi-invest and can aid BD a lot in gamesolving situations. Iā€™m not sure if thatā€™s a good thing.

2 Likes
#1986

ahem
this is the survivability

1 Like
#1987

Still 0 reason for BD or scum to bother about them.

#1988

Ngl I was expecting a piƱata type passive

#1989

Yeah I really am not a fan of that. Exactly the same problems as before but also easier to confirm.

Gr8.

#1990

Just DELETE

2 Likes
#1991

Eh. Alchemist was nerfed but still doing same shit. It encourages to allied with BD which Iā€™m not sure if Iā€™m a fan.

#1992

And all other Neutrals.

#1993

It is still optimal to claim alch, prove, and then watch the game.

Esp as Prince is never gonna bother witha proven Alch and it is immune to hunter. It literally only cares about knight.

1 Like
#1994

No I love interactive neutrals like merc and fool.

1 Like
#1995

I want a passive that gives benefit to the hammer of the trial

1 Like
#1996

You might as well give them a scum objective at this point like tol sellsword

#1997

Thatā€™s actually horrible. Why would survivor-type class ever want that?

#1998

Thats a good idea ngl