Actually I’ma put a suggestion down for that
killing a large amount of unconfirmed people
I would make it have either
One use trigger to ignite
If you kill BD you cant ignite anymore
We’d probably end up doing both indeed.
Do both duh
Oh I see
Yeah no not on my Ranger
Please feel free to submit your own focused around that idea though, maybe I won’t dislike it if the other abilities synergize well
Also give it counterplay so if it outs the scum can deal with it
But like. Just having it be an arsonist ends up with it being a slightly more specialized Knight
is that bad
I don’t think it’s a BAD idea
Then find a twist
also occupies the person you kill?
Basically. In order for a town arso to be more useful than a town vig you need to:
A: Find 3 or more scum at once
B: Have already marked them
C: Be the only TK available
If A isn’t true then a Knight is just as fast. 1 Scum is lynched and the other is CSed.
If B isn’t true then in the time it would take to mark them the Knight could have CSed them instead.
If C isn’t true then you have enough TK’s that the AoE effect of the arso doesn’t matter.
The odds of all that happening are very low. And while yes you are more likely to find multiple scum at once in FoL, you are also more likely to be able to coordinate killing all of them and are also more likely to take a TK’s accusation seriously in the first place.
Ah but you fail to realize that killing town is helpful for the POE, while a knight punishes heavily upon killing town. A town vigilante that can only kill town is helpful even if it doesn’t seem helpful
Irrelevant. That’s a reason for a guiltless vig, not for a town arsonist
No it isn’t, the fact that arsonist can kill town while not killing itself is HUGE in itself, and it’s what make Arsonist so good. You kill all the scummy players that you doubt will be lynched/killed and you douse them while you lynch other scummy players. Even if you kill own town or two you basically are the POE eliminator
In that time a guiltless vig could have already killed them
I mean
It needs more than just that
But yes it is a nice aspect
Are you suggesting we add a guiltless vigilante which is a better knight
That’s likely not happening, unless you can think of a good reason it should?
No. I’m suggesting we DON’T add a town arsonist, which btw isn’t inherently guiltless