FoL Feedback Thread

[orangeandblack5]

On the other hand I suppose that could be intentional

But also like why

[Emilia]

Wait why tf did you merge devil with fool

[Solic]

Read it more carefully.

[Geyde]

Remove poor fellow and then we should be good.

[orangeandblack5]

Why not word it consistently tho

[Geyde]

@Frostwolf103

@Solic

Insanity (Passive) - Immune to death from non-BD attacks once. If 3 or more other non-BD are executed during the day you will kill yourself the next night. You will see the true nature of any tampered lynches.

@Solic

Make sure no more than 2 other non-BD are lynched during the course of the game

Make up your mind.

It suicides once it fails its wincon :^)

[orangeandblack5]

The point is the wording is awkward and could be more consistent

[Geyde]

“You will commit suicide if you fail your wincon”

“If more than two other non-BD players are lynched, you will commit suicide”

[orangeandblack5]

That works, or at least “more than 2”

[Emilia]

Who thought that merging fool with devil would be a good idea

[Geyde]

Pretty much everyone on the FoL team.

[orangeandblack5]

Me

[Solic]

Because Fool was due for some change and Devil is not part of ToL.

[orangeandblack5]

I’m not afraid to stand for that one

[Emilia]

That’s real cancer

[orangeandblack5]

Thank you

[Geyde]

Gladiating Solic until poor fellow is removed since it wins the game for scum if it procs and exacerbates our problems with how Fool worked prior to the change

[Emilia]

Delete priest it’s not part of tol

[orangeandblack5]

but nah technically the wincon was Nuke’s idea

Wish I could take credit for it but he’s way better at role design than I am

[Emilia]

And it’s cancer