FoL Feedback Thread

Forum Matches Forum of Lies
#11799

Tavernkeeper is bad with redirectable knights/Archers/alchemists

#11800

Wait, but you just added the punishment?

#11801

No, please, that would just torture me.

#11802

what
there was always one

1 Like
#11803

Wdym?

#11804

Sorry but, I donā€™t see a punishment on BD King.

#11805

I did it backwards didnā€™t I
good job me

2 Likes
#11806

Yes. Yes you did.

#11807

There was a punishment on lynching bd king and I reverted it
I edited the wrong area when making that post

1 Like
#11808

And invoker canā€™t fake it.

#11809

It was geydeā€™s decision to add the class; Iā€™ll leave discourse about it with you to him.

#11810

He just went to sleep.

#11811

Itā€™s relatively fine. It just doesnā€™t play well with other classes.

#11812

I suck at analyzing balance of classes Iā€™ve never seen before, so Iā€™m just saying itā€™s a matter for him to handle.

#11813

The issue isnā€™t Tavernkeeper, since there were redirection classes before already

#11814

The issue is tavernkeeper because they use redirection for protection.

Drunk redirects to scumreads.

Knight CSes Assassin
Tavernkeeper swaps Assassin and Mystic, a scumread and town which is how it should be used.
Knight CSes Mystic

Both BD are doing well in isolation and now end up with a dead Knight and Mystic.

#11815

You were able to do that as Drunk already

#11816

Drunk targets scumreads. Tavernkeeper targets 1 townread, 1 scumread.

#11817

If a Drunk redirects a Knight on not scum. They were both wrong on the Knight being scum and wrong on whoever they redirect to being scum. Thatā€™s fine to punish.

This is fundamentally different and bad design.

#11818

It is pretty similar to drunk, but I believe the FoL team was looking to add a new bd offensive