FoL Feedback Thread

Pug · June 15, 2018, 12:56pm

We also need Paladin and Paladin!Seeker if this happens tho

Marluxion · June 15, 2018, 1:03pm

Not necessarilly. Paladin could remain badass

Pug · June 15, 2018, 1:12pm

Yeah. But like 2 immune to convert bd is still too much. And if pally was unique convertable. Itd honestly be the worst thing ever.

Firekitten · June 16, 2018, 12:42pm

We need anonymous voters

For no reason

Marluxion · June 16, 2018, 12:58pm

Stop shitposting here

Firekitten · June 16, 2018, 1:11pm

Why does warlock have limited night abilites

And if warlock dies but uses carnage does it still take effect?

For example.

I’m using carnage hang me and it will go through don’t and I won’t use it.

Pug · June 16, 2018, 1:13pm

But just going to say stuff about why I dont like making Sheriff non unique and convertable and Paladin just sits there in its current state.

I really dont like inconsistencies. If one of the hardcounters are convertable. Then the other should be too. My ass ocd cant deal with issues like this

Also 2 easily confirmed BD classes isnt fun for the scumteam. Prince shouldn’t be convertable because Prince is the most powerful asset to BD
Paladin or Sheriff however both have no reason to be convert immune.

Paladin should be toned down a tiny bit and be made an Investigative class that is non unique and convertable. I am all for having more claimspace for scum.

But personally, we could use a new BD social class. Itd be fun.

It is easily much harder to win as Cult than Unseen in my personal opinion in FoL. Unseen just needs a smart MM, Cult need smart players in general.

Firekitten · June 16, 2018, 1:13pm

I don’t think carnage should work if the warlock is hung.

Pug · June 16, 2018, 1:13pm

Now I’m in the mood for a new BD social

Hippolytus · June 16, 2018, 1:34pm

I agree with Pug about changes to Pally (altho Cult does a lot better than Unseen due to alts and Unseens massive reliance on a class with no reliable fake claim).

orangeandblack5 · June 16, 2018, 1:53pm

Honestly I’ve always liked the idea of one faction having a convertible hardcounter while the other than one that isn’t

Ashe · June 16, 2018, 2:37pm

ass ocd? :^)

Marluxion · June 16, 2018, 2:38pm

Your OCD isn’t a valid reason to balance a class around
There can be differences in cult and unseen games.

With your logic, both the cult and unseen should have 3 members max both of which have identical abilities.

CheesyKnives · June 16, 2018, 4:30pm

~~i think he was joking marl~~

Pug · June 17, 2018, 6:57am

But like, cult relies on converts so yeah

Pug · June 17, 2018, 11:01am

Royal Blood is something I have trouble with because it removes much of the fakeclaimability from the game, personally, I’d rather change it to this.

Royal Blood (Passive) - When electing a new king, your votes will privately count as two. Additionally, you will always win against a non royal on a draw of votes.

Yes
No.
Something else (comment below)

0 voters

Ashe · June 17, 2018, 1:56pm

Personally I want to get rid of royal blood altogether or at least changing who gets it or something. While it is an iconic ToL feature I think it’s a safety net for the BD.
~~also I want to see more neut kings~~

Twil1ight · June 17, 2018, 3:02pm

Honestly i wouldn’t call Royal Blood problematic.

Despire the fact that KIng is rarely a target for execution D2 or D3, it isn’t that type of mechanic that makes BD incredibly strong. If you’re claming a class with RB, you also need to be aware of a risk that it brings.

Your suggestion doesn’t really change anything. It’s still confirmable so might as well you can just leave it. Sure we can swap it but…just why?

Pug · June 17, 2018, 9:28pm

Well actually, you just think. Ah, royal blood voted me? Cool

It’s not as confirmable as before.

But the remove royal blood entirely is something i like the idea of

Firekitten · June 17, 2018, 9:29pm

I think Kings die too rarely for it to be useful