That response above me is for Marshal.
And yes, it was different and I am just dumbstruck they deliver themselves to silver platter for BD to lose.
They certainly did when I would have handled N3 differently
On that game, they did not know each other, but certainly informed they were Heretics and thought they can use as Innocent Child status.
It doesnāt work unless they are bluffing.
Marshal doesnāt even need to investigative
Yes but actually no.
They are convertible BD
Inquisitors are basically Executioners, literally with large axe and chopping block.
They are claimvigs with investigative ability and strongman attacks that only works on said claim y x and z.
Of course, there can be only one archer heretic, not just every archer unless itās specified to have two archers in class card DM.
Well that is why me and Eevee pretty much said that in FoL25, we donāt want to rely on Inquisitor kill all their targets when we can just lynch them instead, not because of LOL NEUTS OUT, not itās because they are anti-BD neutral and evil, one that can destroy BD majority.
We have options to stop the Assassin from killing anyone without the inquisitor interfering but no, letās lynch inactive slot who got replaced.
1 Like
By lynching the assassin, we lost innocent-child-chronomancer to the inquisitor, who can delay attacks and bleed attacks from the NK.
Derps can also delay from Assassin when Marshal should have lynched instead, like Shurian and I could āoccupyā.
Yes itās true Assassin can use 2 for 1, but that doesnāt mean they are guaranteed to kill all two targets, especially Shurian being protected.