I answered that if the BD was DI they wouldnāt suicide and if they were healed they would suicide, because thatās how it works in ToL and I couldnāt find any precedent here.
I answered Neutral always because it didnāt really make sense to me otherwise, but the person who asked insisted I was wrong.
I ended up going with Stonewall because I had to pick one in my mind and it made more sense for this to win imo
I thought yes, but Frost said no, so I said no. Glad I was corrected here.
I said no to this one but I really think there should be an official limit
I ended up assuming itād be announced because it can be extremely obvious if itās in effect
Im sorry to ask but how can BD become death immune for the problem to happen, im genuinly lost on that part maybe except king. If so I think to keep it consistent we have to go one or the other. That or have the doc with interactions specifically say that. Like idk i still feel the knight would feel guilty for attacking one of his own, but we could make a pole
This one is a dousy cause theres a case for both, I could reach out to Solic and see if he knew, if not we can decide.
SS is immune to Occupation and is a neut so I would give them priortity over others. but again we could pole this
what arete said
there is 3 per class, not class type. So realistically we could have 5 invests but not 5 paladins. But usually u kinda want to reroll at like 5 invests, cause its prob gonna be sided
My personal inclination is āneutral like in ToL,ā if I had to justify that I would say that having someone randomly show up as killed by BD when no BD claim the kill, or killed by Cult on N1, or whatever would semi-out a Possessor game, which seems kind of unfair to the Poss
How do people feel about, as a minor NK buff, making it so that NKs know when occupied/occ-attempted or redirected/redirect-attempted (like currently is true with Mastermind)? This makes it easier for NKs to fakeclaim investigative and removes the āhe knew he was occād, he canāt be NKā thing that happened this past game.