Okay who the hell are you and what did you do with Hjasik
Thatās why I removed a lot of unique BD and moved to 18p
It often led to extremely unfun situations where stupid stuff just blew up everything
1 Like
I see that. But noone ever told me āyea as host just reroll if you dont like the setupā
And its really against the intention of the game to rerollā¦ Nothing feels better than to win against the odds.
for context, weāre not talking about when the roles have actually been randed to players- just the basic setup before itās randomised and sent to players. if you rerand something subjective like which players are in which slots, well, that is bastard.
Itās not a matter of liking it
Itās a matter of some rands being blatantly awful for every player
Re-rand those
true, but those should arise from the actions of other playerās and your own mistakes, not the rand.
1 Like
In tol I enjoy the swing of having bad rands, like winning as evil against 3 Obs.
But FM should maybe have different standards
Problem is: I dont trust most hosts enough to know when they should reroll and when not
letās face it. at most, only about 50 games of classic FoL will ever get played at this rate. we cannot afford a single one to be ruined due to an objectively unwinnable rand.
2 Likes
Iām saying nothing about the role in general
Just the old punishment
Chillax
2 Likes
thatās why we have to minimise the particularly unfun elements of swing for FoL. hence: remove NK.
1 Like
A bad rand in ToL wastes 20 minutes
A bad rand in FoL wastes 20 days
Yes they should absolutely have different standards
And if a host re-rolls unnecessarily, who cares?
If they donāt re-rand when they ought to, thatās when stuff goes downhill, and then theyāll learn for next time.
4 Likes
All actions are chosen randomly
All players must say random things
Votes random
4 Likes