I agree with this.
A protege shouldn’t become a Spiteful King if the Chancellor is dead as then there’d be no way to counter it.
Plus, it’d basically be a pain to find candidates for a King if a Chancellor flips.
I agree with this.
A protege shouldn’t become a Spiteful King if the Chancellor is dead as then there’d be no way to counter it.
Plus, it’d basically be a pain to find candidates for a King if a Chancellor flips.
Mafia451 lets the scum decide
It’s a neat policy
Thats extremely scumsided tho
also in a multiball like FoL i’m not sure it would work
let cultseen decide? let EK decide? let NK decide? let the neuts decide?
actually
king having the deciding vote on rand is a slightly fun idea
heck
it sounds fun indeed
we took so much voting power from king, this could help out with that
(it would need a solution in case there is no king)
Also, dumb thought:
can you vote for No-King?
I support giving the King a tiebraking vote during rands.
Sure
Sounds interesting
Will chancellor wincon be changing before next fol? To the one Alice agreed on
yes
…so Arbalist is basically just Enforcer (one of the best converts), but better, with extra KP
this seems kind of overpowered
id argue on paper its a top tier convert but i dont think its absurdly powerful
it has potential to get 1 extra kill via getting 3 marks but arbalist or assassin performs the nightkill so KPN isnt going up
timesnatcher rewind also has potential to give an extra nightkill and in FoL i don’t think people are complaining about that
but in ToL, nerf TS
do you think Pin Down would be better if it only disabled death immunity?
it has three strongmans and adds at minimum one extra nightkill (more if the Assassin is jailed or occupied or something)
Pin Down also ambiguously may make bleeds unhealable? not clear
if they live for 3 days then they can get a triple with 2F1
am i missing something?
i guess mark + bleed is a guaranteed kill
mindmeld