Also What I just looked few FoLs And they had RVS And How does game having mechanical info removes RVS unless all invest out at start of game
| Accused | Votes | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Alice | Bazingaboy,Hjasik 
|
3/8 |
| Fireslol | Twil1ght, Margaret, BlueStorm, Boss | 4/8 |
| Moustashe | Isaac_Gonzalez | 1/8 |
| Bazingaboy | Moustashe | 1/8 |
| Boss110 | PoisonedSquid, Geyde, Alice, Kai_5 | 4/8 |
| Margaret | Fireslol | 1/8 |
i guess we’re going no where
people keep bringing up past games as a defense for this game
Example action x is considered as scummy but there is Person y Who does x always as town And there is Person z Who accuses y of x
Why wouldnt it make Sense for y to tell that they do x every game they have And isnt scumtell for them
It’s barely a lead, just cause someone was acting a certain way the previous game as a certain class doesn’t mean that they’re the same class this game for acting the same way. Its witch hunting basically. It’s also a cause for elitest behaviour where if you weren’t in previous games to see how a person acts then you don’t get an opinion on that person. Each game is different, so we should treat each trial on a case by case basis. The so called leads you get by reading someone’s fingertips rarely matter in the grand scheme of things.
This is why anonymous names are so important
There’s a logical extreme to this, so all meta tells should be taken with a grain of salt all the time. They may guide the read, but shouldn’t define it since meta can be overcome.
You can Check someones game and playstyle of people are different Thats Why you need to consider it when making reads for example you cant read experienced player same way you read new player
I don’t think meta gaming should be allowed
you’re not playing the game at that point, you’re playing the player
1 Like
completely defeating the purpose of the game
1 Like
Like for the case of Alice Hja.
Their AtE doesn’t make the case for them being scum. The case for them being scum resides strongest in their change of tone between d1/d2 alongside other bits about scummy motives
No
Meta is exactly How I caught math last game like What youre saying here is completly Wrong And can be checked
I think x is scum.
People aren’t convinced if ‘it’s because I said so’, and I could have misread.
The reason why x is scum is y, z, and a. Actions they have made that come from an anti-town agenda potentially, how they approached a read, and how they interacted with a known scum.
is there not a way to play with random names or something?