We already did our best we can’t
I wouldn’t. A bit rng is fine. A good BD can survive an evil king. A good cultseen can survive a BD King.
We don’t know the exact forumula tol uses to roll the setup. Because we know it’s somewhat random but they raise and lower percents depending on what has rolled. For example if a sellsword roles there’s a slightly higher chance of a good king spawning in that game
Add Neut King in starting pool
no
Ok
Neutrals side good until they don’t lmao
How about 1% psycho king spawn
Actually I figured it out
I know why king is unbalanced
It’s been staring us in the eyes for so long that it’s basically hidden in plain sight
Add pretender to balance king
delet king, no more royals
No
The problem, is the fact that people are punished for executing a king. The fact that they are punished, discourages people from executing someone NOT BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE THEY ARE GOOD. But because they are scared they are wrong.
As an experiment, in a mountainous game I want you imagine a setup where the hosts announces to everyone that this person has a 75% of being town and a 25% of being scum. However if they are wrong they will not be able to lynch the next day. I’m going to tell you that this experiment will fail 100% of the time.
BD executing BD is enough of a punishment tbh.
The swing of an evil king only exists because people are scared of trying to read the evil king
The swingyness of a king is balanced imo. A bit rng is completely fine, we aren’t playing competetive or something like that. As long as every side has a good chance to win, it’s fine.
It’s fine
but we aren’t striving for fine we are striving for perfect
and there’s no such thing as perfect