[FoL] Forum of Lies 24 (16/16)

[anon97870008]

It’s not as important.
Just know, Maxwell, as host it’s important to be fair and proportional

[KyoDaz]

@KyoDaz

for editing the posts to avoid post restriction.

That’s because you had a post restriction and attempted to increase it artificially by editing.

[Maxwell]

yes, as I said multiple times before, eevee assumed I was intentionally attempting to circumvent the post restriction and this assumption was unequivocally false

[KyoDaz]

I mean, you did avoid the post restriction. You just didn’t think you did.

[anon97870008]

I mean, it’s common sense I’d prefer warnings than modkills for a single edit, but your case was so major that a warn wouldn’t have been sufficient

[Maxwell]

I explained this here

@Maxwell

No, I wasn’t. Eevee claimed that without knowing my intentions and that claim was false.

I just wanted to fix the typos I made in that post and also correct the fact that I had failed to include Vulsquid in my original PoE. I was never trying to circumvent the PR and would have sacrificed 5, 10, or even all of my remaining posts to do what I did had that have been necessary.

I was confused why edits that weren’t quickedits were banned as those were fully recorded by the system. I got the explanation I was seeking from Luxy; that even though recorded edits don’t technically have to be banned, they are because it would be to much of a hassle to enforce waiting 10 minutes between each edit to avoid quickediting, so editing in general is banned to make things easier and I accepted that explanation.

[KyoDaz]

@Maxwell

I was never trying to circumvent the PR

You did though.
Your intention was good, but you still commited the offense.
That’s why the edit was a modkillable offense.

[Solic]

I get the point, but I disagree.

If you’re just normally talking irl, you can slip up and quickly correct yourself while remaining authentic. If you go back a day later and are like I never said that, I meant this, it’s obstructing communication.

[Maxwell]

Yes, and I agree with me getting modkilled,
I was just trying to explain that it wasn’t intentional like eevee claimed it was.

[KyoDaz]

Oh. I see. Well, that wouldn’t have been modkillable if post restrictions weren’t enabled tbh.

[Maxwell]

@anon97870008

I can’t see really how it can be done unintentionally

People who get themselves modkilled intentionally shouldn’t just be modkilled; they should be blacklisted.
An illegal action doesn’t need to be intentional to get modkilled for it; in most cases, it isn’t. All of mine were due to ignorance.

[anon97870008]

I mean, if you try to argue that this wasn’t intentional…

[Firekitten]

going to be honest maxwell is one of those people that I would trust when they say whether it was or not intentional

[anon97870008]

Yes, I trust Maxwell in this, that it was really not intentional.
(It’s still blatant)

[Emilia]

Me

[Emilia]

System didn’t record that

[KyoDaz]

I believe what Priestess is saying here is that the edit was (obviously) intentional - not what Maxwell’s intent with the edit was.

[Maxwell]

Let me clarify.

I did intentionally edit the post, but I wasn’t intentionally trying to get modkilled, because I considered the fixing of typos and the fixing of the unintended omission (of Vulgard/PoisonedSquid’s Slot) of information from my PoE explanation post to be equivalent to the quickediting out of typos that I have seen so many people do and get away with. The difference is, I made sure that both of my edits were system-recorded, because as I said, I consider system-recorded edits to be a much lower level of integrity breach than quickedits.

[KyoDaz]

Technically with the information you edited in, yes, it’s less of an integrity breach as it’s documented.

[KyoDaz]

However with the information you edited in it should have been on a seperate post.

@KyoDaz

Technically with the information you edited in, yes, it’s less of an integrity breach as it’s documented.

This is why I don’t believe it would have been modkilled without the post restriction.