Okay, so apparently maximizing BD chance to win is anti-BD.
lol.
Okay, so apparently maximizing BD chance to win is anti-BD.
lol.
He is and will be anti-bd that game.
Yes since BD’s goal is to destroy itself
Kek.
You almost defeated your greatest opponent, yourself.
He is Inquisitor so what I said made sense, but no, lets lynch napoleon who is trying to get his slot better what is left by inactive player who get picked for PoE who is not correct until proven otherwise.
Inactive slots as scum is common but looked down upon.
Game ended?
Yeah.
Especially that slot is notoriously inactive, why is having Napoleon as legit lynch after he talked bit with reason and stuff?
Well Kyle did it, but no way related.
“exing neuts” = “maximizing your win chance”
lul
Okay, I think it’s time for me to write my modrant.
I read an old post of Alice’s on reading tips and I’m now analysing ended games to see how they apply in real situations. They do, indeed.
It is stupid to assume that is correct on previous SFoL game with Shurian as Crone when we would have lynched Wazza instead who got occupied by vampire, who also shares wincon with that said vampire,
Versus a crone who fakeclaimed as vampire, despite MM, convert and NK died?
At least yes, this anti-bd neut did help BD, while Strigoi and Crone would have lost.
Our goal was to defeat the Unseen, not take down some random Neut that needed to kill one out of four protectives
He is STANDING AGAINST OUR WAY
Which is correct on the wincon.
Na, not really, he was actually very helpful
(While twisting that said wincon lol)
Killing a archer, sheriff and chrono is helpful, okay zoomer.