[FoL] Forum of Lies 25 (Push-ups)

Forum Matches Signups
#101

If it were up to me, id add more potential neut slots :stuck_out_tongue:

#102

Good! Neuts shouldn’t claim.

#103

:rage: NANI!?

#104

I agree. I thought the 18 player was to give town more of a chance (because I feel scum can have it easy with a halfway decent scum player).

#105

I mean, adding 2 players so we have 18 players has only a few possibilities
+2 BD (= makes it a bit more BD lean, but it’s fine in my head)
+1 BD +1 neutral (= would be pretty much the same balance as with 16p I think)
+1 BD + 1 scum (= makes it way too scumlean)

1 Like
#106

Personally? If you want to give scum more of a chance without giving them an entire convert slot…give them a guaranteed neut slot. 9 times out of 10 the neuts wincon is aligned to theirs, and the neut doesn’t give as big of an advantage.

#107

Three neuts and NK?

#108

he means 2-3 neuts + NK

1 Like
#109

So having sellsword, warlock and then maybe Scorned/Fool?

Why.

#110

2 neuts, 1 potential neut, 1 NK.

#111

Neuts can also still command crossfire from assassin/CL/NK

#112

Tbh 1-2 neuts in a 18 player game
makes the life as NK even more fucked than it was already

1 Like
#113

No kidding, that’s been overwhelmed feels like.

They have to outsmart them all, their only reliable help comes from non-killing neutrals, but they are not guaranteed to help NK and stick with more numbers instead because it’s safer.

#114

You know, that alchemist’s betrayal on FoL11 proves this.

#115

I’d not punish anyone who throws or replaces out as NK in this current build, it’s even worse than before for NK players

#116

Dirty Alchemists. You side with scum, always.

#117

Its hard to make an NK-friendly format. Even if you make an OP NK its just…so difficult. You’d have to give NK some BD-type mechanics.

#118

I mean claiming neuts

#119

But having just 2 extra BD is far too townsided

Think about NK in this scenario.

#120

Any neut that claims will be kinda confirmed