The only fallacy is the 2 BD slots added
The fact that the game is scumsided and town needs a buff does not imply that every buff that one could theoretically give to town is a good idea
The two BD slots also serve an additional purpose, in that they reduce the chances of the game being over on like D3/D4, which is generally regarded as undesirable
Good you reached the right conclusion yourself
Three starting scum has been tested (EFoL 3)
It turns out that if you do that the game becomes incredibly scumsided
I know
How about We add 1 scum slot And 2 BD slot
How about we see if adding two BD slots makes the game excessively townsided and rebalance if it does
Last time I checked this wasnt efol
I think 2 BD slots will work out
Let the hosts/balancers whatevers do their job
We will see if it works out or not in this game
We discussed whether or not to run an EFoL to test this change and decided against it
Where
In the private realm of the balancers
Hows adding 2 BD slot not efol worthy
because FoL 24 was the first or second regular FoL since the last EFoL
There were more changes too
Biggest one is probably adding plurality
But I think, the people want finally to play a real FoL again
The plurality change was made separately from the 18p change
You’d think that if they wanted to play regular fol youd give them regular fol instead of adding experimental features And naming it fol
Let’s move this conversation to the feedback thread, I’d like to be able to find sign-ups in here
Hey, it’s not like adding +2 BD and plurality is completely breaking the balance
EFoL is mostly for stuff you don’t wanna test in normal FoLs because they will be horrible ideas and completely destroy the game might not work out at all and ruin the experience of the players.