If you had to then yes, but I donāt think it would be a good idea because of the bad situation, so I will generally fight for myself, but I rather that then we make a rushed lynch like yesterday.
Iād personally think of better lynches outside of my POV, the fact I wasnāt executed idk if amelia was just slightly more relaxed and I seemed more credible because we didnāt have loads of deaths or they had trust in my claim and reasoning ect. (Then again FOL princes could be less trigger happy idk).
This apparently doesnāt apply to me, when I got 6 votes in 1-2 minutes.
Flip flopping. Also no, they couldnāt guarantee that; they had no info.
This is what pinged me the most. In this scenario, the third bleeder should either claim in order to push the other two, or we should assume they donāt want their identity to be known because theyāre scum. Calc saying āit doesnāt matter muchā implies that they donāt actually care who the third bleeder is, and they never tried looking into it. They were blatantly trying to push a ML on me/PK, and judging by their thought process here, they didnāt seem to care which one of us would be yeeted.
Thereāsā¦ thereās no ifs? If youāre town, the answer is always no? Especially when we donāt know if the NK flip was fake and therefore, if scum is about to get majority soon or not.
Thatās quite bold coming from someone who scumread me 10 minutes into D1 and hasnāt re-evaluated since. Your reluctance to do that is another reason why I scumread you, because the case you made on me D2 was just cherry picking posts you found scummy tone-wise rather than actually taking a look at my reads and thought process.
Letās just make sure it doesnāt get to that. Weāre not going to rush things like that again.
I thought I was around at SoD, but I guess not. This was after I had made 5 posts.
Also no, itās not. You scumread me D1 for things I disproved already, and have kept that scumread without looking into my reads and thought process. Itās D3 and the reads youāre the most confident about are gutreads, and I donāt know how no one else thinks thereās something wrong with that.
This is where your contradiction is.
If you are town you should be able to realise it for yourself.
I want to help, but it is good you know for future games.
Italy has found Kat and Vul incompatible. Kat and Vul are not groupscum unless Italy lied, which would make them a second neutral, groupscum or NK, assuming Areteās flip was false. Iām not going to theorize because Iām focused on you and Calc right now, and two of those possibilities arenāt guaranteed to exist to begin with.
Anyway, I do like how instead of defending yourself, you decided to divert the attention elsewhere. Thank you for not explaining yourself and making yourself even scummier than you already were.
Fun fact, I also did this in Airlock. A game PKR was in. Where I was town.
Assuming Areteās flip was false does lead to more narratives but it is logical to assume it was not falsified. Myself, Katze, Vul and I think some others have agreed on this now in retrospect.
We already know we have 1 neutral in the form of the Fool.
Either this was ATNoName or it is still alive.
If we have another neut non killing then town is literally unable to win at this point.
So let us go on the basis of this still being winable since game is ongoing.
We have a flipped NK and it is likely the Fool is dead.
This would mean that if Kat, Vul and Italy are āscumā they would all be groupscum which is what leads to the contradiction.
Italy chose to claim 2 people as incompatible. If Italy is on their team then it does not make sense unless this is a planned theatre and I doubt it at this point.