FoL29 - Uninformed Spec Chat (Jane/Anstreim/Nappy Edition)

Also daily reminder that it got a legitimate Butler killed in some game I don’t remember.
But that’s just semantics :^)

FoL 24? We mislynched a Butler there, it was a pretty easy ML.

Nope it wasn’t a ML.
It was a Princess (?) claiming that said Butler visited a nightkill, which he admitted to – but they in fact had a K/O flirt on the slot.

Oh, yeah that was FoL 24.

Well it “was” a ML.
But not a scum-pushed ML.

Well, actually, it was both :wink:

1 Like

Marshal what the hell.

This was a pain since Maxwell account no longer exists and no links.

1 Like

I swear those logs don’t have the limit of 1000 characters.
God I wish that limit was abolished so much.

btw

Gods, why.
I never read into statements like these but scum probably did.

What do you think of kat-chan’s posts today?

He’s fine.
Either a town-siding neutral or town, no in-betweens.

1 Like

Do I still need to gib opinions or can I just cop-out by outing my Prince-read on them?

I mean you could still give me your thoughts but after that… statement on D1 I view it more as a “healthy skepticism” and not “subtle shade from the side”.

1 Like

How are the Princes always unexperienced people?

I don’t know but the rand seems rigged.
At least I got more or less spared of playing it in my first game.

1 Like

There needs to be more objective reads on Vulgard here.

Otherwise they’ll never be convinced.

Saying their tone feels off or their reads feel forced prompts someone like me to take another look at them, but I think one needs stronger evidence than that

Well, Wazza still has his redcheck.
Except it’s more of a yellowcheck.

1 Like