FoL29 - Uninformed Spec Chat (Jane/Anstreim/Nappy Edition)

Who got lunched?

why do i feel like this comes from townā€¦?

not wolfgard

:crying_cat_face:

theres the self-perservation

Vulgardā€™s WiM at EoD, after heā€™s not a wagon anymore:

1 Like

D2 btw.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

help me.

APPELS IS TOWN
PK IS TOWN

FIND ANOTHER WAGON please!

BUT OF COURSE THEY WONT VOTE OBVIOUS SCUM THAT IS WOLFGARD!
BECAUSE HIS POSTS WERE ā€œWRITTEN BY TOWNā€
Holy shit someone save my sanity

Appel basically claimed scoom with that bleed on PKR though.

How did she claim scum if she has been scumreading him the whole day and backed it up multiple times

This is true, though thatā€™s probably a result of skyrocketing WiM and i dont think itā€™s unfakable.

But yeah, no one brought up logicial points agaisnt Vulgard and hence given the limited arguments in thread, I could see how this might be clearing.

1 Like

TBE was bled.

Itā€™s not clearing.
Thereā€™s no world where this is even slightly clearing.

Appelsiini is real hunter lmao

Itā€™s literally NAI because it can come from each and every alignment there is.
It says nothing.

I donā€™t think it is.

But when your argument against Vulgard is ā€œhe is not being villagerā€ then yes, it can cancel that out.

I havenā€™t been reading the game, too many posts.

Appel bled PKR.
PK bled Amelia.

Appel and PK are both legitimate Hunters.
How did Appel ā€œscumclaimā€ if she bled a person that she has been reading as scummy throughout the day? That was reply to Jane.

1 Like