FoL29 - Uninformed Spec Chat (Jane/Anstreim/Nappy Edition)

Two can play this game:

1 Like

But do you know why I’m saying exactly Sellsword?

Enlighten me oh neutral one.

Eh I saw this post as more NAI tbh, I could see it come from either alignment.

Hmm…
Actually, I would like to know a bit more about Vulgard’s opinion on Arete. @ Vulgard

What I meant by this is that usually, especially upon pressure, from what I’ve observed, Vulgard usually comes up with more memey responses, which is why I slight TL’ed him.

The Priest claim happened later though.

Could you explain what you mean by the whack tone?

I think his reads have some genuinity to it, he explains most of his reads, the only read which kinda pinged me was the Arete one but I don’t think that’s enough evidence to warrant a wolfread. I would expect much more crafty reads from Vulgard as a wolf.

I haven’t looked at them yet, I’ll give them a look in about an hour or two.


And he’s not replicating it – he’s trying but failing, extensively.
You know Nappy, your insistence on defending his slot makes me wonder. What is your read on Arete/Kat/Chloe?
[/quote]

Also this post is literally TMI that you know my read isn’t genuine lol.

Fuck he got me.

I’m not going to go into another wallpost but I’m pretty sure that I could refute most (if not all) of those and be considerably more suspicious of you afterwards.

It’s just not worth unless there aren’t several ā€˜stronger’ players in the game imo.

1 Like

Agree to disagree. :’)

I swear I’ll get EK next time we play together and pocket you :^)

1 Like

100IQ Sellsword signals.

1 Like

This is ungamer.
If I wanted to soft a Sellsword I’d make a stone + wallpost related puns.

1 Like

If I wanted to soft Sellsword I would defend Vulgard.

Fixed :^)

1 Like

image

That’s only if you’re in the game though because:

  1. Your reads and points against Vulgard are more logical (you pointed out the inconsistency with the Chloe read and the response to Arete’s pressure with an Arete read) - easier to understand objectively
  2. You have a high opinion of me and you’d probably scumread me for burden of proficiency lol (TBF I fucking have Vulgard like near lockscum)

I don’t know if Arete/katze would eventually back their reasons with objective logic - they probably can, but at this moment of time, their read on Vul has been mostly intuition and I can probably have a somewhat logical explanation to create enough doubt to ensure Vulgard isn’t doomed by other players.

Anyways, I just wanted to sneak this in. I think we should end this part of the conversation now.

1 Like

I’d probably claim D1 as Sellsword.

Now this is ascended softing.
But it doesn’t work everywhere because of different fonts/font sizes.

1 Like

As another town role

I think a lot of people view you as competent to be honest.
You are one of those people I’d expect to solve stronger players like Arete/Kat themselves.

Also I know that some people have issues with explaining their thought process so it’s entirely possible your defense could work, because some town would look at it, go ā€œit doesn’t feel right but I can’t refute itā€ and drop it.

Also what are your thoughts on ATNoName?

Also being refunded 1 like per hour is literal torture.

image