Don’t argue that this is a scum motivation move because I did not think in your ways .-.
Yes, I’d thought Insanity was scummy D1, but if I were a bleed-capable role I’d at least give them a defense first. This isn’t a way I’ve ever seen someone react to a bleed though.
Imo putting rune back into null for now I want to know why the bleed was so early 
Its not like rune comes across as a “bad” player but ye.
I don’t see it a T/W interaction based on Insanity being like “welp I guess i’ll die”
Insanity is still slightly scummy imo but I don’t find any real motivation behind being Hunter bleeding early then outing that you caused the bleed.
Maybe over thinking this but It just doesn’t sit well with me why wouldn’t you just give insanity time to clear the slot or not then bleed them?
Well, Insanity self-resolves D4, so we should probably move on to the other inactivity people in terms of pressure or theorycraft more possibilities.
Please don’t if town you’d be vital to any counter mainstream pushes.
Nah there’s nk/evils/Neutrals
so I’m going to disagree that Insanity being scummy solves Rune
What do you think Rune would be if Insanity is town? What do you think Rune will be if Insanity is wolf?
I’m kinda fine with lights slot for now it’s slightly scummy but I rather push those that literally haven’t contributed on much
High possible scum I really dislike the early bleed I just can’t think of a good reason to do that.
doesn’t feel very thought out as scum though.
Didn’t say that. Just want to mainly hear the motivation behind the bleed in the first play
TBF I don’t really understand scum early bleeding and outing as hunter the entire bleed is just weird as heck thinking about it
I mean from a look at SFOL63, scum always bleed whenever possible and then now we have two nightkills that points to nothing.