Yep, I did a good play.
You have a neutral who wants to work with a BD.
You don’t lose any important role when electing a king, yet you gain a king wich wants to help.
Yep, I did a good play.
You have a neutral who wants to work with a BD.
You don’t lose any important role when electing a king, yet you gain a king wich wants to help.
#Erhm, some things are going on rn with Pete, so, if anyone wants to join in they can. Pete is just unavailable to play atm.
#If no one replaces Pete I’ll have him suicide.
I mean, mayority was reached BEFORE you unvoted.
Ah ok
Oh yeah, one thing: I think one trial per day is in effect since FoL4. So I’d say vote carefully.
#Actually, trials don’t stop the day timer like they use to. So you can have as many trials as you want, just as long as they’re in the span of the day
Fair, fair.
So what’s happening now?
If pete does return, we he be put on trial or?
But we do or do not have a trial?
#As Fade said “Trials are just a way to extend the day”
#Uh, as to whether we will have a trial, I’ll ask the other 2 gms for their input
I vote him innocent, no matter the defense he lay - I think he’s trying to rally support from blue dragons and he’s being hinting himself he’s investigative?
Do we Lynch a tainted slot is the question
??
Forgive me for ignorance, but Pete is one slot out of 15 and that doesn’t help one thing except eliminating one slot and there’s still 13 to go. Nevermind the Psychic who hasn’t claimed his or her name.
The fact that pete is liking your comments and not coming back sort of makes me laugh…
I will probably give Pete a chance to prove himself.
To be fair, we were hounding him relentlessly.
I still think Pete is hinting he’s investigative-type?
Besides, if he wants to continue playing the game after this, he needs to give testimony, otherwise he might be banned for gamethrowing.
Investigative-supportive to me…