audience is right
arete stop being dumb smh
we call that a convert into loss
anyways, on a serious note
i like it.
audience is right
arete stop being dumb smh
we call that a convert into loss
anyways, on a serious note
i like it.
What if we made it nomination based?
Aka person a nominating person b for the most improved (or ‘very improved’ or someth) and saying they did x y and z better this game than in there past or something
Instead of voting most team effort let’s vote worst team effort and whoever loses is banned from forum forever.
This is a good idea.
That’s a horrible idea.
Everyone has rights.
But in all seriousness I think DybuDabu was a Town Team Player Tbh.
Oh, so this was what it meant.
…wouldn’t 4 people hypothetically be able to:
–wouldn’t this give 0 points for all of them?
Player 1 and 2 have - 1 votes
Wait, no. These are separate awards, so…
…huh. The different categories limits the votes a bit for me to see the loopholes.
Wait, they are different alignments?
There’s more than 4 people in a game
Alignment & Number, TMVP, SMVP
…is this it? A 2:1 ratio for a neutral score of 0?
–technically everyone can have -2 points for not voting, but I’d rather find the possible worthless results like “all zero”.
Hosts have votes and they break ties. If two hosts tie each other then a host-off must be had.
Well… that ought to be “fun”.
Oh well. Good luck to future players.