yes, that also meets the rule
Okay so… I was correct the first time? I highly doubt that though.
30, 38, 46
yes, that meets the rule
observes closely
AAAA I was trying to do one that doesn’t meet the rule.
13, 19, 37
also meets the rule
i have 3 theories but i’ll let jane figure this out
unless they want to phone a friend
Is the rule that every triplet meets the rule?
I honestly have no idea what else it could be.
that is not the rule
3.57, 8.42, 1.27
that does not meet the rule
progress!
2, 6, 4
that also does not meet the rule
katze thinks that their 3rd theory is correct
Okay, so is it that the numbers must be in ascending order?
If it isn’t I’ll probably just stop.
And then be dissapointed because it was really simple.
what is katze’s third theory
theory 1: 3 numbers
theory 2: any amount of whole numbers
theory 3: 3 numbers in ascending order
with the caveat that “3 numbers” specifically might not be important
alright
both of you are correct
(technically it’s ‘three real numbers’ but that was kind of implied by the wording I gave you at the beginning)
I did it!
Back to trying to signal the thing to aroot.
so like
there are specific ways that people normally get this wrong
but you didn’t do any of them
so good job?