this is two town interacting, 1 mislynch away from LyLo
here’s me forcing you to remember that there was a game where a memelord prince openclaimed day 1, missed 4 jails, wasted two executes on an empty cell, and proceeded to survive to day 10 carrying the game for town
katze lolcats as the most suspicious person in LyLo
datbird proceeds to ISO a signup thread
town win
1 Like
Still regretting a bit to have mercilessly lynched Possessed after he replaced in, for the scumminess of his previous slot
But reevaluationg people after replacement gives an unfair advantage to that slot, so it’s better not to
1 Like
Instant reaction tests are dumb ways of doing this and shouldn’t be allowed
But sometimes, this happening subconsciously is inevitable, if the person who just entered the slot has a more obvious meta and/or more WiM than the person who just left it.
That’s why I’m a fan of the new replacements policy; hopefully that will help to minimize this problem over time.
It’s not (solely) about reaction testing
It’s about discouraging strategic replacements
People often replace out when they get heavily scumread, and the replacer manages to be way more towny
“Y has replaced in, do not discuss”
“Y, what are your night actions – also you’re L-1 and poisoned so what are you lol!”
1 Like
This is true and unfortunate
And blatant strategic replacements as well blatant irl emergencies (like your fracture), the two opposite ends of the spectrum, are usually easy to determine.
However, much of the spectrum is related to atrocious WiM and/or exhaustion that can make the game hard to bear to keep playing, that is often some sort of mixture of IRL problems and in-game problems. It can be tricky to determine how much of that is due to IRL problems and how much of it is due to in-game problems (Also, lying in this regard can be easy). That’s why I support the new replacements policy.
just like intent in gamethrowing here, intent in replacing out is remarkably hard to prove.
Having a bad time irl -> your tone is atrocious and you get scumread for it -> you give up and let someone replace you -> that person is able to be blatant town -> Win/win situation. You don’t get the stress you cant bear in your irl situation, and also you have a pretty good chance to win
how bad is not bad enough?
If being in the game longer will cause you to get expelled, get fired, or become suicidal, it’s a bad idea.
I agree with the current new policy that consistency across the board is the best policy
I would also be okay if any replacements gave a blacklist instead of 2+ in a two-month period (but in that case, you probs would be blacklisted unless they were to accept medical documentation as proof of your fracture)
point is, intent is hellishly hard to prove, and i dont think there’s any way to solve the matter more fairly than the current new policy
I’d argue this is pretty good proof
id also get blacklisted since I replaced out twice in a pretty short period of time because of irl events ayaya
1 Like