Magician/Enchantress Bd/unseen offensive

CW redirect is absolutely support

I disagree itā€™s similar to debauchery.

Swap doesnā€™t directly help either.

Neither do heals. A heal disrupts the Killerā€™s ability, it doesnā€™t make your any better off compared to if nothing happened in the first place.

In fact. When you really think about it this applies to ALL support abilityā€™s

Since preventing a negative effect != causing a positive effect

Then Physician is offensive in your definition, the problem is support and Offensive are very similar

I feel like offensive favours more disturbing everyone and support disturbs killers/evils.

Nope. I already said the distinction

Basically:

ā€œIf target player attacks someone prevent the attackā€ = Offensive
ā€œIf target player is attacked then prevent the attackers attackā€ = Support

The end result is identical. Thus replace ā€œattackedā€ with something else and you get:

ā€œIf target player visits someone then occupy themā€ = Offensive (specifically snare trap)
ā€œIf target player is visited occupy the visitorsā€ = Support (specifically stand guard)

But how does Cw empowering a investigative prevent the attack?

Just like how swap doesnā€™t prevent the attackers attack and redirects them.

CW empower on invest doesnā€™t interact with attacks. It prevents frames

Support = helping others with certain abilities, heals donā€™t prevent the attack just save them from it.
Offensive = preventing or disturbing someone targeting a Ability.

Killer/Invest empower and Frenzy are the farthest from offensive btw.

Itā€™s not like truly support abilityā€™s canā€™t exist, they are just confirmable and thus cause balance issues. The recharge ability CW had for a bit is an example of that

Heals absolutely prevent the attack in every way that counts. You can argue semantics all you want but at the end of the day an attack resolves as a Kill. So if there is no dead body then the attack didnā€™t fully resolve. If it didnā€™t resolve then that means it was prevented

Frenzy isnā€™t offensive I agree. Thatā€™s support its helping the Assassin kill

1 Like

Just because something uses the occupy or redirect mechanic doesnā€™t mean it is automatically offensive

I see your point.

But redirection is offensive even Cws.

Offensive is always about preventing a action if thatā€™s direct or indirect.

Support is about keeping your target from not being killed, or having a negative action aganist it.

Notice most support abilities prevent there faction from being harmed, like frenzy will never negatively effect the Assassin or target or Cw empower will not negatively effect the target.

Offensive will block any sort of action not determined by faction.

Maybe Iā€™m looking into this too much but itā€™s more up to how someone interpritates a class type.

I suppose recharge doesnā€™t qualify as support then

most

A definition needs to hold in ALL cases

Also just because a class has a Ability doesnā€™t make its ability fall under its class type

Look at Prince, its a social offensive killer support.

Look at Alch itā€™s support but can kill

Noble gossip is investigative.

So many problems with saying a class Ability falls under its class type.

It does hold in all cases I disagree with SG being a mainly support ability. Same with redirect.