Please don’t waste space with useless filler like this. Private message me if you want to say things like this, unless you are trying to look cool.
- Unless you play Forum of Lies, you can’t determine if something is a “fluke” - so you don’t know anything about it being used.
- This class is actually quite popular amongst the Forum of Lies community, thus, once more, it’s proven successful.
- You tell me to not waste space with “useless filler” but you post about a class being considered a “fluke”
Please, kindly not be a troll for once?
1 Like
“Unless you have held office, you can’t criticize politicians”
That does not address what I said, wow.
In FoL, you can spend all the time you want checking how a class works. Not so in normal games.
I’m not; just because someone has a different opinion from you does not mean they are a troll.
- It’s not really that hard, if it help I can remove the King, Merc and Fool clauses
- What would you suggest to improve it?
- I’ll call one of them hookup or something idk
Also Norm:
“I think this has key flaws”
“It has proven successful elsewhere”
“Probably a fluke”
This isn’t an argument
“Probably a fluke” isn’t an argument it’s what you say when you can’t think of any actual ways to help your case so you resort to “pssh you got lucky”
3 Likes
The only suggestion I have is to allow Royals to be matched together just because I do kinda feel like all of the special rules with compatibility makes this class extremely difficult and frustrating for newer or weaker players. I would try scrapping one of these specific rules and that would be the royal one as matching two Nobles makes complete sense.
I’m not sure what the flavor of matching is here…is Jammy implying the Maid is encouraging her targets to
uh
you know
Maid is by far my favourite added role, Squire a close second. After that in order it goes, eating shit, being castrated, being buried alive, all the other added roles, Moonspirit.
Seriously though Maid is beautiful. We never had a Waitress but looking at it now Waitress is actually pretty underpowered tbh. I would giver her extra uses of Poke Around imo.
I don’t think Maid herself should be changed at all though she cool af.
suggested rules for compatibility:
members of opposing factions are not compatible
members of the same faction (even neutral) are compatible with each other
the mercenary is compatible with their target
scorned is compatible with everyone but their targets
fool is compatible with scorned only
No Compatibility is perfect as it is. FoL players have just learned them don’t change them now.
I am okay if you want to keep everything else, but change one thing:
royals being not compatible with each other.
it complicates things to much.
Additionally, royals did often marry within the family, to preserve there blood or something. Don’t want to get into specifics much…
Nothing complicated about it. You overcomplicate things when you bring incest into it though.
2 Likes
She said “because it would be weird” suggesting that there is no balance reason for doing so.
I have shown that it is not weird (by medieval standards) and so it should be abolished.
I guess that makes sense.
balance>theme
however, this probably will cause lots more princess claims
Bump because this is still the best class idea in general on this entire forum tbh
1 Like
Bos says it’s too complex to put all the compatibility options on a class card so I need to uncomplicate it
Matchmake " check if two players are of the same faction"
3 Likes
Easy
Literally a parity cop, only modifier is Royals are incompatible
Edit: Ninja’d