funny, you get offended when I call you pal, but expect people to not be offended when you say you have the right to make life and death decisions based on how a person thinks…
stop using big words to try and be smart, speak so people can understand you. If I have the brain the size of a peanut, you need to dumb down your post a little.
I can translate
“Thinking smartly that they think they believe pointless lists can hide the fact their brain is small”
I’m not a fucking expert, but I could understand that
@RopeStringFace quit finding every opportune moment to troll. You derail threads faster than anyone here.
Grizledorf. I hope I’m never on your team.
The new allies ability looks pretty good. Finally, I won’t have to kill the king night one to have a chance when nk.
here is why it’s not meta gaming
To prove something is not something. you should probably define the something.
So rather than me defining it . I thought I’d let Wikipedia do that part .
Metagaming is any strategy, action or method used in a game which transcends a prescribed ruleset, uses external factors to affect the game, or goes beyond the supposed limits or environment set by the game. Another definition refers to the game universe outside of the game itself. In role-play situations, for example, it would mean to tell somebody some information about another player or something they are doing that the said player’s character should not intrinsically know about. In simple terms, it is the use of out-of-game information or resources to affect one’s in-game decisions.
So is the tactic of using whispers to gain information from players employing any of the characteristics of meta gaming.
is it outside the rules of the game ? no
is it using external factors to affect the game ? no
does it go beyond the prescribed limitations of the game envirobment ? no
So as it does not meet the prescribed characteristics of meta gaming. it cannot be described as meta gaming.
So now the only remaining issue is . Is Wikipedia’s definition of meta gaming a legitimate source or should we use a definition that you would like to either define yourself or define from an alternative reputable source.
Please note if the only person who believes that your own personal definition of meta gaming is correct then you are of cource welcome to continue to believe that you are correct and everyone else is wrong .
I do not troll or derail
that still makes no sense given the conext.