that is an incredibly stupid-ass thing to bank on
if I came and saw it was on 33 not 34 I would have noticed and asked the same thing
I would but still busy and kinda lazy to right now.
Sorry not sorry.
So Parady Cop for the next cookie who should we check?
Cause we could post like
"Simon and Alice share the same win condition. "
That could prove or disprove people.
Ok I’ll answer your questions.
Lets go through why I’d say it was an ITA on Mist.
Someone gets shot or insulted here and they die in the day? If it looks like an ITA and sounds like an ITA, then it is an ITA.
like i posted this before i even saw your post kyo.
i didnt even know why alice voted me
Not entirely
I came back to thread and didn’t realise that DatBird had died until I noticed N.1 getting two extra votes then scrolled up to see the event and somehow landed on someone mentioning DatBird died or just scrolled up to it, I’ve forgotten
Crich you can’t see something in retrospect and act like all the time that it was obvious
I didn’t think it would kill mist
1 Like
I’m being quiet but I’m here anyway trying to recover.
I think we can only target people of the opposite group (Pink targets Blue and vice versa) with abilities and ITAs?
What Im saying is it feels like ur blaming Sulit for Mists death when like realistically why did u feel her itaing someone that was apart of an event and not like the 4 or so other people who also shot. No one was expecting Mist to die as it was an event about MU people so like it just feels ur pushing the buck onto Sulit similar to N.1. When imo its not her fault
From what i gather yeah so a backup would have to be on the oppsite team of Chem to backup the Dat role
1 Like
V
Alice
SirDerpsAlot
Ami
Hippolytus
Leafia
Moleland
Apprentice
Geyde
KyoDaz
CRichard
Frostwolf103
TL
N.1
An_gorta
ModeShifter
Italy
Sulit
Nerbins
Techwolves
MaximusPrime
Icibalus
Marshal
Cloned
Centuries
Solic
oB_L1ght
PKR
Simon
DatBird
Napoleon
W
Like, so far I’m not liking my reads as it feels like I have way too many wolfreads.
also do yall think i’d be careless enough to kill someone as an evil and then just tmi about it without an actual reason that i could feasibly have as an innocent?
so the possibilities would be
evil simon > kill someone > ‘woah someone is dead i have no idea how i know this’
evil simon > kill someone > ‘woah someone is dead and i have this reason why i know this’
innocent simon > come back > ‘woah someone is dead and i have this reason why i know this’
like cmon.
at least give me the credit on not blatantly tmi-ing like that, even if it doesnt keep me from being innocent
woah woah woah
marshal is waaaayyyyy too low on there
like unironically
explain your read on me
what?
the playercount was literally the first thing i noticed both times i came into the thread so far.
