I get that this is confusing, but why the heck would you nominate Arete if you pardon him in the end anyways?
Locking votes is done not because we want it; there is a system behind the voting system.
No I didn’t.
Because I’m just giving an opportunity, regardless of whether I plan to use it.
Alright. I will see whether you changed votes or not in a minute.
What do you mean? What kind of opportunity?
Opportunity to execute Arete? If the majority doesn’t want it, then what’s the point of presenting the opportunity? If it’s 100% for opportunity, then why don’t we just nominate everyone?
1 Like
Uh… no? You amplified the votes.
cheese was at 4-3 (exe-pard), and then you made it 5-3. Opposite thing happened with N.1; he was at 3-4, and then you made it 3-5.
The guy is a newbie who doesn’t understand most of the stuff. Despite me not bothering to talk with him, I wouldn’t necessarily say he is towny either. He’s just that; a newbie.
I’d like to differ. My spreadsheet says that these two ought to have 1 more vote at that point in time.
Current VC should be this:
Dunno why mods thought Italy & cheese had 5 votes and 4 votes respectively.
2 Likes
To be more specific, either already locked or will become locked the moment a vote is cast
1 Like
Because it’d be a big waste of time, just like how we’re currently wasting our seconds writing typing to pardon Arete.
That was only after you realized something was wrong. The current stand is 4-4.
Good for you.