They probably went to the movie theater that opened back up. I read about it on the community board.
Uh… Right. Time to play this game.
Uh… Let’s see…
- Shabaloth
- Pukka + Godfather
- Po + Godfather + Assassin
…I don’t think thinking of these possibilities is useful. --hey, does the Demon have a chat with the Minions?
there is no scumchat in this game
the only way to speak with anyone privately is by whispering them.
As long as we can get N.1 tomorrow, this is fine by me.
As a dumb person myself, I question Derps’ reasoning. If I were a Demon or Minion, then I see no reason to attack Derps, nor any reason to not attack Derps. I could even use a simple RNG to duke this out.
Oh. Good to know. …I ain’t going to keep track of the whispers, so good luck with that though.
note: in botf 2, scum avoided scrutiny specifically by making it such that whisper analysis was useless
so this strat sometimes works but not always
I don’t understand why scum would kill App either. He’s just the player who made everyone wait for EOD, so are they planning to kill off the LHFs?
I was joking, but there is seriously an analysis for this kind of stuff? Wow, that seems extreme.
–also I just realized that I survived the first night.
Yay me.
I wonder how much [X] becomes too much?
Your argument for me being Demon/Godfather is that I killed you for having information that you were a Gambler
Gambler is incredibly weak early game not only for malfunctions but also because you have to guess a role and you can’t guess the Demon right away or you always risk a 3/4 chance of dying (unless you malfunction), ontop of the fact I believed you were doing nothing because of malfunctions but we’ll ignore that on my argument for now because it’s not 100% proven.
I would have no reason to kill you as Gambler n1 and therefore doesn’t make me anymore likely to have killed you out of everyone here.
Also I don’t know who I would’ve killed or if it would even be optimal to reveal such information but I can tell you it wouldn’t be someone who voted execute on everyone and proceeded to ‘reaction test’ 3~ people to gain no information from it
If anything you being gambler makes me less likely to be Demon/Godfather
Tbh my strategy would’ve been with information that you were Gambler if I was Demon to mislead the thread on what Demon is was to ensure you wouldn’t be able to guess me; and proceed to use any time you guessed me as Demon for towncred
I thought of this within the time I made my last post. Knowing you were Gambler and killing you is never optimal for evils here.
…crap. I just realized a stupid way to force me to live.
Uh… right. For starters, I need to confirm something.
/whisper @Apprentice
whoops
missed SoD and the mech speculation around it
uh
I wanna say its slightly more likely to be a pukka game because of death count but I dont think knowing which really helps besides for a courtier, and it should become more obvious with more time, but IMO courtiers shouldnt yolo n2 anyway if they want to do it on the Demon(which they should)
slightly more likely pukka, less likely zombuul or the Shabboth?(you know which I mean) and Po could still go either way is about all we can get from it. Speculating further on ‘but XYZ Po slightly likely’ wont get us anywhere, so lets take what we can and not mess with specifics.
so yes I just speculated while saying speculating useless thank me later
The whole Kyo/SDA thing
looking at all of these:
gambler is not the best here. Particularly without claims. For earlier on, trying to get something like a grandmother’s n0 or a Tea Lady or Professor would be infinitely better, particularly before a Professor rezes or a courtier…courts
gambler is only strong when they have preferably alot of claims to work with, and its been made clear claiming its -EV by vets so that would probably never happen
I dont think killing someone for being gambler makes sense. Dunno if you gave any reads but they might be useful to look back on.
also I didnt think you read all of the classes so I had a thought somewhere you were gambler without you claiming it with this post so your point may not even apply
since there is no scumchat this doesnt clear kyo but I dont think it makes sense to SR kyo for it? Not all scum decide who die, but if Kyo is a scum who decides who die, I think they wouldnt attack SDA. But there was more then 1 kill anyway, and this goes nowhere, but it shouldnt warrant a SR.
I have no clue why in this world of the next SDA was killed but I dont think it was on claim. Could just be WiFoM or literally marson-level RNG, we dont know, and the more people act like they do the less sense it makes. Just stop it. Giving only SDA a pass for obvious reasons.
oh and on a note about zone - their town
I did have a little thought d1 that I didnt express for somewhat obvious reasons because they were tryharding a bit but their lust for death just fits into their lolmeta also claim will make it obvious it very obvious point or another anyway
the SDA logic could apply to app but I think? App has made a few reads in his lifespan, and someone getting killed for reads makes more sense so ill take their reads a little more accurate(they can be wrong, but mightve been right on a crucial spot) then I mightve otherwise
lemme ISO to find some of those
App's Reads
not really a read but it would be a motive for Zone? But I think zone’s town anyway
also this was a clarified joke by EoD anyway
this…was also a joke
well it looks like it
I dont think they got killed for this
again, maybe this makes L1ght look a little better, but it doesnt actually point to scum
…and thats it. So they werent killed for their reads I guess. welp, b r u h
Also I think I’m going to go read the OP because Arete is dead and talking (and ig SDA and App)