Leafia: brings it up again after I said to stop discussing it
Me: defends my logic
leafia: kinda sus
Leafia: brings it up again after I said to stop discussing it
Me: defends my logic
leafia: kinda sus
FK the timing of that post is a bit suspicious imo
i think that 0/0 counts as a majority?
Wdym 0/0?
zero out of zero outsiders voting for your exile
That’s because I thought of it right after that
It requires 3 different character types to be voting me.
7p game is base 0 outsiders.
So only travellers and townsfolk would probably vote me if I’m evil.
Unless we somehow got an outsider from outsider modifications.
So yeah.
But don’t bother, I’m good.
Maybe
I won’t lie about this part. I only told the truth because I wasn’t aware that the agitharp’s target gets told that they were targeted. If I had known, I probably would’ve lied about that part. But at least I know now that I’m 100% the Sleeper.
Yes exactly what I mean.
It looks suspiciously shady as you literally mention this RIGHT AFTER Magnus confirmed not Agitprop message.
Then again, I’m not clearing Leafia. Consider them under no more or less suspicion than any other player right now.
Unless I’m hypothetically the Ambassador.
You were the one bringing it up again Atlas.
I won’t deny that, but I think it’s a logical thought to have right after someone confirms someone as not being X
i thought the wording required majority from 3 different character types
so outsiders would count as a character type, which with zero voters and zero members would count as one of the three necessary for majority
I also think that one out of two travelers voting on you counts as majority but need clarification on both
I’m further defending my logic and calling suspicion on you at the same time for flawed logic
I should have confirmed in quotes
Uhhh…
Maybe.
Not sure about the science behind that.
I won’t fault you for it I guess since coincidences happen but.
I’m watching you closely since Ici said you were the best player on the list here
Yeah the wording sucks I agree
My logic isn’t flawed.