deliberately not mentioning something after claiming to be agitprop’d is enough to be a madness condition i’m afraid
“Ici shouldn’t be exiled”
when delivering it i swapped it to
“Icibalus shouldn’t be exiled”
but
it’s dumb and i’d just rule claiming to have been targeted by the Agitprop to make you far more liable to be executed, but it’s not the worst call i’ve seen
nono
Agitprop is like Cerenovus but slightly different (weaker, but more versatile)
The twelve billion errors in character text and vague bullshit in ability text doesn’t help either
I was being serious about the fact that I was going to heel turn on you, I just made it in a joking way with Leafia. And it wasn’t even the conversation you had with me. The conversation you had with me made me look at your earlier posts and your earlier posts looked like you were trying way too hard with Leafia being outted wolf D1. You retracted that later, but I really did not like the way you handled that. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter, but for next time, be careful when you go ultra aggressive like that, it can be a indicator that something is wrong
here’s my case for the big flaw with this setup:
villager abilities give information that is so direct that it forces the storyteller to fuck with the village for the setup to not resolve into an easy v win. as a result it just becomes a Not Fun setup to play because the Storyteller’s influence can’t really be played around
1 Like
i am completely fine with ST influence in BotC, it’s just that this setup feels like it’s going to resolve into a situation where the ST has to call the game themselves way more often than, say, SnV