[Misc] BotF X - New World Chaos - Game Thread (Evil Wins)

Forum Matches Completed
#1081

The difference between this and other type of solving was that other solving was mostly mechanical this game, and it’s pretty easy to wave your hands around with mechanics and “solve” the game. Here, I am having a discussion with you and I can read into why you are bothering to keep responding to me here, whether or not you have a motive for doing this as evil, ect.

And yeah - Atlas was one of the people that I was thinking about when I said the thread had a few amount of readable posts. I don’t think it’s enough content for me to reliably say whether he’s town or not though, because I don’t know him well enough so I’m using the “experience of how people react as each alignment on average” in order to read those posts, which is why I just kept those thoughts in my head mulling over them. From my experience, the stubbornness that Atlas had when explaining his posts continuously comes from town. Mafia tend to have to fake the feeling of being upset and thus would stop letting their annoyance be known after a while. For him to have done it for so long is probably townie.

#1082

No i mean like

When you said those conclusions generated this discussion right here, I mean that technically any form of reading and solving could’ve generated a discussion like this, so why intentionally stretch out your thinking like this

#1083

Oh. The problem was that it was so early and there was barely anything to actually analyze. Plus, it helped that I was going to explore those worlds previously before I revealed as double agent, so posting those thoughts would be pretty easy instead of trying to read into other posts.

#1084

Am confused.

Post which thoughts

#1085

The one about Cheese and Night.

#1086

There being nothing to analyze doesn’t mean you stretch out your conclusions does it?

#1087

Like there should be other things you could do instead if you have nothing to analyze.

#1088

You are getting hung up on that part. Let’s replace “stretch” with “sloppy”. Why should I care that my analysis is sloppy early on when my objective is to get a read on someone by generating content?

#1089

That’s scummy as hell?

If you want content, generating sloppy conclusions probably isn’t the best way

#1090

Like I didn’t actually do mental gymnastics when making those posts. Those posts were natural. I should clarify that. But I wouldn’t have put that much weight onto those posts if I had to kill someone right there.

#1091

How is posting sloppy analysis to generate content scummy?

#1092

I don’t even think sloppy is the right word here to use, if you get so hung up on adjectives why don’t you assign analysis values based on how much weight they hold.

#1093

That’s not really the initiative you should be taking to get content for analysis.

Like, you are essentially filling gaps within the evidence for the conclusion with nothing, which doesn’t exactly help make the read feel natural or agreeable.

#1094

It would be scummy if I yelled for nights head for acting like that, or if I yelled for cheese head. No, I posted it, acted like I was confident in it, and then watched. You assume it’s scummy because you assume that is not how the game should be played.

#1095

You’re the one who chose sloppy bruh

#1096

So what are you doing with those conclusions then if you’re just not bothering with them???

Like I said, if you want to generate content, I would say there’s better ways

#1097

I did not fill gaps. I went from A->B->C Cheese liked a post where I softed brainwasher. Demon knows I’m a minion. Therefore, Cheese is a demon.

That analysis doesn’t have gaps. It’s just that you shouldn’t put so much weight into the conclusion because the analysis, while may be true, could be false and shouldn’t have much weight into it. But I still posted it, because cheese or someone else would react to that post.

#1098

Think of it like random voting session, but upgraded.

#1099

I mean.

The logic becomes very unopened.

You assume one thing and then that leads you to reach bad conclusions.

Assuming he liked that post cause it’s a Brainwasher soft (even though I’m like 99% sure no one here even began to think it was a soft) closes out other very possible possibilities.

#1100

It’s RVS but worse