I just explained?
Yes, but we already knew Funny was good. You’re only comparing Dumb to Classic
Wait Mole didn’t say there’s anything stopping us from opening the same good present twice
easy win. If Mole edits rules it’s cheat
You have to find 4 good presents. You cant find the same object multiple times
/hide the Funny and Classic presents
I’ll make a decision once I finish my assignments. It should take at most 2 hours more.
Neither Classic nor Funny contain any red colour.
But Dumb have a red dot, Nice box is entirely red and Smart also have a red dot.
Also worth to mention too that both Classic and Funny contain green colour.
So in my opinion, Bad is a good pick.
Good is the best pick though. Good not only doesn’t have red, but it also contains a double letter like Classic and Funny
Yeah but green colour.
I am totally not biased because green is my favourite colour guys.
Also, there’s exactly 5 boxes with green colour. I think that’s too much coincidence.
3 hours later
1 hour later
I’m still analyzing the presents.
Colours:
Nice - Bad - Red
Cool - Red
Silly - Red
Lame - Red
Smart - Bad - Blue
Funny - Good - Blue
Good - Blue
Classic - Good - Green
Dumb - Bad - Green
Bad - Green
I think statistically color-wise we should have a higher chance of a Good Present being in Cool/Silly/Lame.
Verb-wise both Smart/Dumb were bad so I think ideally Lame here’s the ideal choice being that that’s the opposite of Funny. Cool/Silly are opposites as well.
Wait, this actually makes a lot of sense.
So far all good presents we’d had used double letters.
For x2 letters we have Cool/Funny/Classic/Silly/Good
For x1 letters we have Nice/Dumb/Bad/Lame/Smart
Former were all good, latter were all bad.
Well, there’s one extra box in the red colour catergories so what do you think of that? Also, I don’t think statistically work because Mole is using a pattern and it wouldn’t make sense for him to just put one bad box and one good box in each colour catergories as that would make solving it hard.