So we have better way,you can convince others to not listening Marl.But removing Marl from game because he plays pro if he is scum not a good reason to lynch him.
And why any townie member would want to them to mislynch ? I am sus with this so my vote still stays on you
The problem is that Marl is much more convincing than I am; I realize these are my two options here
I don’t want you to mislynch, I want you to think about this
I mean yes Marl is acting leader all of time.But lynching him for being leader is not a great idea.He mostly die n1 anyway.
Nah jk, I might’ve gone too far there
I still want to gauge interest whether or not you think this is good or bad to do; I personally see plenty of benefit.
Unless someone slips, of course, then I’m switching to them
I contemplated whether you were trying to bait scum in in lynching Marl or something for this reason, but the fact that you continue on with this tangent can only make me guess you are either a VI or plain scum and I am assuming the latter.
We should never lynch someone just because they are a leading role or not. We should lynch someone based on our guesses at their alignment based on the material that they are posting. If Marl is apparently this strong leading figure (which I disagree with btw, but whatever), then he can also be that for town. Keeping a closer eye on him is not what you have been suggesting. You have just been suggesting that we lynch him period. I think we found scum honestly after all this. /vote Vulgard
honestly I’m just waiting for input from the others because the fact you want to lynch me based on a strategic lynch suggestion is dissatisfactory
It’s not strategy it’s a idiot move. But go on after your statement I have something to say.
Look at it this way; how is it any good for me to lynch Marl if he’s town and I’m scum. you’d just lynch me tomorrow no question
I’m not tunneling for the sake of tunneling, I’m tunneling because I genuinely see this as a good move unless we have a better option D1, and we don’t, at least for now
K here’s what I have to say.
I think solic and vulgard are Town and vulgard is making this really hard trying to say this.
Solic has been aggressive while voting and has found vulgard as scum because he thinks he Wouldn’t do that as town.
Vulgard wouldn’t do something like this as scum. It would be a idiotic move so I’m assuming he’s Town who has a dumb idea. I don’t see vulgard making a dumb move like this as scum.
Which is why I’m still voting htm anyone wanna join me?
Why would town Vulgard and scum Vulgard have differing intellects? I read Vulgard correctly as scum in the Cult in the Jungle game, so I am more confident in my read this game. I definitely think he should stay in the lynch pool for today, but the day is young.
/vote Htm
I mean it can be bluff too.I don’t see legit reason for lynching Marl because he is a leader character.
It’s not like that it’s like…
You know how when your scum your always more cautious. Do you see vulgard as the type of scum to do that and make a mistake like that? I don’t. I’m not saying he couldn’t do it I’m saying it’s very unlikely.
But thanks for joining the htm vote.
Ah I misunderstood you then. I think I understand what you are getting at, that scum is less likely to make such a gambit, but I cannot say I wholly agree.
I haven’t played against town Vulgard yet, so maybe I am psyching myself out, but you must admit that some of his posts were fishy. I think it is also a mistake to just think scum will not take any risks, because if taking risks makes you look town, of course they will do that. Vulgard also chimed in plenty in the Cult in the jungle game, where he was scum.
But you are right, plenty of people still need to have their say, so let’s move on for now, and we can CFD back later depending on what happens.
