The Pretender
Neutral Offensive
[x] (Passive) - [x]
[x] (day ability) -
[x] (Night) -
[x] (Night) -
Goal - Be elected as King and survive until the end of the game .
Let’s decide on a balanced pretender for FoL, and then we’ll run it through Geyde.
The Pretender
Neutral Offensive
[x] (Passive) - [x]
[x] (day ability) -
[x] (Night) -
[x] (Night) -
Goal - Be elected as King and survive until the end of the game .
Let’s decide on a balanced pretender for FoL, and then we’ll run it through Geyde.
No.
Shoehorning in king based neuts for the point of having king based neuts is…no
I’m fine with anti-royal as a concept.
Pretender isn’t that.
Fine. I’ll make an anti royal.
Also is there a royal blood Passive in FoL?
Yes there is
Cool. So an anti-royal idea…
I need to know; is there a limited number of guaranteed royals to spawn in FoL? Important for goal.
Only Prince is guaranteed.
But would a goal like Kill all royal family members be bad? Would there be too many royals?
Thanks for telling me.
I think I’ll do an evil royal who wants to kill all other royals. This good?
I don’t think it’s a very good wincon. Simply having a wincon where the number of target varies wildly is going to be very difficult to balance
That’s why I wanted to know if there was a royal limit.
I’m more worried about a royal minimum
Well, there’s a guarenteed king and prince.
Wait.
King isn’t royal funnily enough
Alternatively we could just not have the idea of anti-royal whatsoever
I’m a bit salty when it comes to king neuts if you couldn’t tell
You suggested it.
Hence why having an NE with special King interactions makes more sense.
Or a Royal with the wincon of “starting King loses” but otherwise doesn’t actually need to be crowned
Anything that cares about anti-king other than exactly Insurgent always seems poor
Maybe someone who just has to have the Starting King dead and have someone not royal be crowned?