Also this post alone was >rand V
Not that it matters now.
It’s obviously analytical instead of agenda-driven.
I think I’m conf!biasing myself based on Anstreim’s reads but:
This can be easily interpreted as: “Hey Applause is my top scumread but please disagree with me because I don’t want to have to lynch my scumpartner!”
See, this is why I didn’t want to influence you much.
I’m not 100% confident they are groupscum together but I think the possibility is definitely there.
Don’t sheep me nerd.
Work with me and Jane instead, my reads aren’t that great on average.
Eh whatever
Shallow is null.
Pushing on low nullposters is not good unless you are lacking on scumreads.
Sidenote, I think I know which player Replay is. I won’t be revealing my guess of course.
I kinda dislike this recent post from Replay though.
It’s the same thing that almost reads LAMIST: “Oh I didn’t believe that Love was a PR, why would the scum kill a VT claim, I never expected them to die tonight.”
Hmm.
I don’t want to focus on player identities at all, I saw Telephone’s post but I’m not even going to check the birthday thread or whatever – meta doesn’t matter.
Applying it to an anonymous game just sucks out all the fun.
1 Like
I mean it doesn’t matter a lot.
Players usually change their playstyle when alting/anon’ing to disguise their true identity.
People still have their small quirks that are hard to change imo.
You can read them off of that.
I hate posts which usually say “I’m surprised that X died” everytime someone dies but statistically, at least, for me, they aren’t a good scum indicator.
2 Likes
Honestly, I’m the type of player who when doing NKA, wants to get to the point.
None of that “I’m surprised” nonsense or “what scum killed Y lol!”.
Only in some exceptions they might be seen as okay.
Like I found that Alice was believable when she argued that she was never the one to kill CRichard in Community FM.
Also, sidenote.
I actually think LAMIST can be townie.
Depends on its presentation.
I don’t think it’s townie here, I think it’s NAI (statistically).
