It’s literally just wifoming your reads
Each player should be evaluated with reasoning. “TWTBAW” itself is just leveling yourself away from a read.
If you want to go into the realm of “X player would not do this or care this little as wolf” that’s fine
But TWTBAW (too wolfy to be a wolf for our newer players, basically the idea that someone is acting so much like a mafia member that it loops around to being villagery) is level 1 reads that serve to help nobody
I think scum have much more reason to flood the thread with takes and not have to back them up
I’m not gonna stake it all on this read
But it’s bad and I think he knows it
Either way I genuinely have to go now
But just
Please make concrete reasons for reads, those of you who know how to, and those who don’t please try
D1 is more important than you think, n1 actions shape the game and not a ton is going on.
Try to give what substance you can
Quick question, in this are we allowed to say our role outright?
You see without a power of murdering a wolf, there’s an argument that wolf will just kill you if you are being a bit too towny in thread.
No, Just in other games similar to this claiming was forbidden and results in bans. Didnt see anything about it so wanted to make sure
good thing this is less confident because this is merely a hypothetical and not strong whatsoever
didn’t like this guys first five posts tbh but i kinda wnated to see what he would do later this d1 and im a bit conflicted on him
i want to say marl town based on the wolf games ive read but i usually don’t feel confident with tonal reads until ive played a couple games with them and i havent played many games with marl
almost half your posts are you talking about how good marl is at reading you lol
