between him and aelin i’m probably more confident on aelin but they are all just below the null line
i’m bound to be wrong on like 1-2 of them probably since my day 1 reads are never usually perfect
probably only 1 wolf tops above my null line though, if any
You might miss it, but the topic of this discussion went from Windward to you.
And you gave the roundabout answers twice by now.
I will ask it one more time.
Where is the post, if I missed one, which could give hints towards Windward motivation for selecting their game start strategy?
Again.
If we think about it, it’s not an answer at all.
Not to my questions at least.
You said you’ve read Widnward’s ISO when you checked what I posted.
You said I should have an opinion on their MOTIVATION, not on what they posted.
I asked which post makes you have an opinion on this topic or should make me have an opinion on it.
Thing is, I believe you did not read into Windward’s thought process at all.
And you are just saying I did chose to not have an opinion.
Which is obviously true. And I’m directly saying there was nothing that explained their approach at the time post was made.
Yet you said you know what I meant.
You said you know his ISO.
And when I asked if I missed something, you decided to not answer me twice which post could change my mind.
Thing is, either you lied that you looked into someone’s approach towards the game, or you just wanted to push me for something without putting much effort into checking if something really is true or not.
Either way, it looks bad for you, unless you can explain your train of thought.
If you can, please explain it, so I can finally understand which posts you are referring to.
You have no idea if there was anything which indicates windwards motivations for selected gameplay, but you assume that there is one and that I should have found it, and it’s scummy that I tell there is none, without checking if what I say is actually true or not?
You just… assumed I lied and you suspect me due to this?
Are you serious sir?
Becouse this sounds very awkward for me.
I believe they are coming from a community that enforces reads on people.
Which possibly could be this site, to begin with.
And I believe they are too stubborn to actually check if something is really holding ground or not. Just jumping towards “meta” based conclusion.
For a lack of better word… It’s bad choice of action.
If that makes sense for you?
To explain it more directly - they want me to have focus on more people, despite me clearly reading only Wind’s ISO as well as having conversation with them.
Which is clearly impossible, and would be me just tossing random/meaningless stuff?
They want me to have definitive take on Windward on day 1, despite theirs behavior obviously being able to go into both directions?
Which is also forcing me to just toss random/meaningless stuff?
Life is not black and white. Neither is this game.
I don’t have to solve everything myself, nor do I need to have a full opinion of everyone.
And I’m very, very, very annoyed at people who are trying to force reads on others, just because they think they should have one.
Forcing reads is bad. I don’t NEED to have opinion on something. I don’t NEED to have any opinion to begin with.
And if they cannot read into actual thought process and check if it holds ground from my point of view and if that point of view is town or scum aligned.
Or if they cannot analyze me as a person and try to understand my playstyle and if it’s coherent in itself.
Then I do think theirs solving ability is a bit off.