also pigeon wasn’t a pgo if that’s what you’re talking about
just look at his picture
Read this, it’s literally her first post:
I tracked one of the recently deceased and got a result back. I wonder if the person they visited could have done an action to kill their visitor.
Arctic:she wrote that she masonized pigeon
then whysper said she tracked marshal to pigeon
therefore it is NAI
Whysper already said she tracked either Marshal or GGhana into a potential PGO.
Why would she claim that as scum; what good does it do for her if she is scum?
by making it seem like she has actually info and thus it was her real action?
the original plan was probably just to claim marshal visited a random person and no one would be able to confirm/deny it, then marshal’s logs were revealed and she just wrote pigeon instead to frame him
Read this, it’s literally her first post:
I tracked one of the recently deceased and got a result back. I wonder if the person they visited could have done an action to kill their visitor.
yeah pigeon’s action was definitely not a PGO so that’s what i’m trying to say
pigeon drew a picture of someone smiling and pointing at the state of Texas
presumably marshal
and marshal died
also pigeon wasn’t a pgo if that’s what you’re talking about
just look at his picture
We know that now, but not then, when Marshal’s logs didn’t appear yet.
she literally has no risk by claiming marshal visited a random person since marshal’s cause of death isn’t known
yeah so doesnt that make whysper look worse actually?
she didnt have to actually do that action, she claimed it after marshal’s logs were outted
and besides she could have just made it up anyway if there weren’t any logs
I am thinking its whysper my main problems though are that they claimed that action pretty fast into the day and I don’t think they’re type of person who would impulsively do major decision before consulting with her wolfbuddies or thinking it through
i’d like for both whysper and pigeon to give their interpretations of what happened, whenever they get here
Arctic:she didnt have to actually do that action, she claimed it after marshal’s logs were outted
and besides she could have just made it up anyway if there weren’t any logs
I am thinking its whysper my main problems though are that they claimed that action pretty fast into the day and I don’t think they’re type of person who would impulsively do major decision before consulting with her wolfbuddies or thinking it through
gonna be honest and i considered that if she didn’t just slank in the wolfchat then one of the wolves might have gotten yeeted out of the chat or become a LW or something weird
but if whysper got yeeted out of the wolf chat then quite honestly it would make sense for her not to consult her team
by making it seem like she has actually info and thus it was her real action?
the original plan was probably just to claim marshal visited a random person and no one would be able to confirm/deny it, then marshal’s logs were revealed and she just wrote pigeon instead to frame him
So… assuming Whysper is scum, she made a drawing of tracking Marshal for unknown reasons?
Before I continue, who do you think got NK’ed N2?
i guess let’s see if anyone claims a chat removal
there is exactly 1 scum in whysper/pigeon and 1+ scum in whysper/zone/windward which means we should always resolve whysper first
Before I continue, who do you think got NK’ed N2?
GGhana, i’m sure of it
No, that was a fake drawing to use as a fake action
my theory now is that wolves killed marshal but not with the factional, and then whysper could try to frame a random person as a PGO that she visited
she literally has no risk by claiming marshal visited a random person since marshal’s cause of death isn’t known
yeah so doesnt that make whysper look worse actually?
You guys don’t get it. It’s about the timing.
She posted her drawing soon after she claimed she tracked Marshal, which meant that -unless she had multiple drawings of fakeclaims- it was impossible to fake her claim.
Why did she claim to have tracked Marshal, unless she already knows that Marshal will die N2?
my theory now is that wolves killed marshal but not with the factional, and then whysper could try to frame a random person as a PGO that she visited
like it’s 0 risk and potentially a lot of reward
she can either frame a random person as having used a PGO, or she can just claim marshal died to a completely unrelated action
Why did she claim to have tracked Marshal , unless she already knows that Marshal will die N2?
because wolves might have planned to kill marshal
She posted her drawing soon after she claimed she tracked Marshal, which meant that -unless she had multiple drawings of fakeclaims- it was impossible to fake her claim.
Why did she claim to have tracked Marshal , unless she already knows that Marshal will die N2?
my theory now is that wolves killed marshal but not with the factional, and then whysper could try to frame a random person as a PGO that she visited