we can do a number of things
poison, bleed, suicide bomb, vig
that’s 4 killing actions and there’s 3 wolves
we can do a number of things
poison, bleed, suicide bomb, vig
that’s 4 killing actions and there’s 3 wolves
desperado also
ngl i was going to submit a poison last night but changed my mind and decided not to kill anyone
this would still be a block to whysper
Exactly my point.
kinda thinking whysper is priority yeet
so was i but i decided to invest instead like a dumbass
never doing that again
too many things point to her
weh
i kinda thought it might be a strongman but i might be stupid
same but at least i got feedback
i was just trying to come up with an investigative action that nobody else was likely to choose
(cause someone asked why i picked such a dumb one)
it doesnt look like a strongman though
redirection + stop
idk
weh
please can people stop submitting stupid ambiguous actions thanks
i’m glad i can draw
I personally believe my actions have been quite clear with their intentions.
because i can guarantee that 1-2 of the wolves is in the group of people with dumb/ambiguous actions
e.g wazza, pigeon, aelin, whysper (anthem’s n1)
how tf are my actions dumb or ambigous?
My first action was literally a dayvig to Nightingale/GGhana, my second action was literally to revive Cloned’s and Eli’s voices and my last action was very clearly to skip the night phase to reduce the factional kill.
Sorry I want more control over the kills we have, you know, basic common sense? Something you clearly seem to lack in various different ways.
because your n1 was obviously going to be cancelled and your n2 was obviously not going to be interpreted how you want it to be because hosts wouldn’t allow it, just like they wouldnt allow a painting that shows all the mafia dying even though it’s obvious wht it is
wait when did that happen? i thought it was announced that no actions could target them because they went informed spec